Artículo Original
Intestinal parasitosis and environmental contamination with helminths and protozoa in a Quilombola community of southeast Brazil
Parasitismo intestinal y contaminación ambiental con helmintos y protozoarios en una comunidad quilombola del sudeste de Brasil
Priscila
Ferreira Pires Eustachio1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/9903422832203717
Letícia Andrade
Avelar1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/1672251563205793
João Victor
Leite Dias1* http://lattes.cnpq.br/2310316131617979
Dimas Ramon Mota
Queiroz1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/0879233363928021
Nadja Maria Gomes
Murta1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/4715827570119818
Gustavo Henrique
Bahia de Oliveira1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/0742047174758367
Rosana Passos Cambraia1
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5804714230015958
Herton Helder Rocha
Pires1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/8645674180243781
Helen Rodrigues
Martins1 http://lattes.cnpq.br/3946423269844170
1 Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri. Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
*Autor de la correspondencia. Correo electrónico: joao.dias@ufvjm.edu.br
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Intestinal parasitosis by helminths and protozoa is still today a global
public health problem mainly affecting people living in conditions of social
vulnerability, including rural communities.
Objective:
Describe human intestinal parasitosis and environmental contamination with
helminths and protozoa in the Quilombola community of Quartel do Indaiá
(of African descent) in the State of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted of stool and soil samples by spontaneous
sedimentation, and of plant samples by centrifugation sedimentation, to detect
intestinal helminths and protozoa. Water samples were analyzed for total and
fecal coliforms.
Results:
Helminths and protozoa were found in 45.5 % of the people (n = 66). The
species detected were Ascaris lumbricoides (18.2 %), Entamoeba coli
(18.2 %), Endolimax nana (18.2 %), ancylostoma (6.1 %), Iodamoeba
butschlii (4.6 %), Giardia duodenalis (3 %) and Trichuris trichiura
(1.5 %). More than one species were present in 19.7 % of the samples. In 18
of the 39 sites sampled, the soil was contaminated with E. coli, E.
nana, A. lumbricoides, I. butschlii and/or Enterobius vermicularis.
Vegetables (n = 135) were contaminated in 75 samples with 7 of the 8 species
analyzed. The contaminants were E. coli cysts, A. lumbricoides
eggs and ancylostoma. All water samples were contaminated with total and fecal
coliforms.
Conclusions:
The Quilombola community of Quartel do Indaiá had high levels of human
infection and high environmental contamination with intestinal parasites or
protozoa, probably due to lack of appropriate sanitary conditions. It is necessary
to improve the access to treated water and sanitation.
Key words: intestinal parasitosis; environmental contamination; vulnerable populations; rural population.
RESUMEN
Introducción:
El parasitismo intestinal por helmintos y protozoarios todavía es
un problema de salud pública mundial, que afecta sobre todo personas en
condiciones de vulnerabilidad social, incluso las comunidades rurales.
Objectivo:
Describir la infección humana y la contaminación ambiental por parásitos/comensales
intestinales en una comunidade 'quilombola' Quartel do Indaiá (descendentes
de esclavos) del Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Métodos:
Estudio de corte transversal con análisis de muestras fecales y de tierra
por sedimentación espontánea, y de vegetales por sedimentación
con centrifugación para detección de parásitos o comensales intestinales.
Se analizaron muestras de agua para detección de coliformes totales y fecales.
Resultados:
Se observó la ocurrencia de parásitos o comensales
en 45.5 % de las personas (n = 66). Las especies detectadas fueron Ascaris
lumbricoides (18,2 %), Entamoeba coli (18,2 %), Endolimax nana
(18,2 %), anquilostomas (6.1 %), Iodamoeba butschlii (4,6 %), Giardia
duodenalis (3 %), and Trichuris trichiura (1,5 %). Para 19,7 % de
las muestras se detectaron más de una especie. El suelo estuvo contaminado
en 18 de los 39 sitios muestreados, con presencia de E. coli, E. nana,A.
lumbricoides, I. butschlii y/o Enterobius vermicularis. Los
vegetales (n = 135) presentaron contaminación en 75 muestras de 7, entre
8 especies analizadas. Sus contaminantes fueron quistos de E. coli y
huevos de A. lumbricoides y anquilostoma. Todas las muestras de agua
estaban contaminadas por coliformes totales y fecales.
Conclusiones:
La comunidad 'Quilombola' Quartel do Indaiá presentó alta infección
humana y alta contaminación ambiental por parásitos o comensales intestinales,
lo que se debe probablemente a la falta de condiciones sanitarias. Se necesita
mejorar el acceso para agua tratada y estructuras de saneamiento.
Palabras clave: parasitosis intestinales; contaminación ambiental; poblaciones vulnerables; población rural.
Recibido:
28/11/2017
Aceptado:
13/09/2018
INTRODUCTION
The human parasitism by intestinal helminths and protozoa is still an important public health issue, particularly among people who live in conditions of poor housing and sanitation.(1) Approximately 2 billion people are infected by soil-transmitted helminths, which more often are represented by Ascaris lumbricoides, hookworm and Trichuris trichiura.(2) Among intestinal protozoa, the most important human infections are amoebiasis, cryptosporidiosis, and giardiasis.(3)
The occurrence of intestinal parasites is closely related to the environmental, social and sanitation conditions. Soil temperature and moisture are critical for the embryogenesis of helminths. Poverty, associated to lack of treated water and wastewater treatment, favors the maintenance of contamination in water and soil, which leads to successive reinfections of people in endemic areas.(2) Cultivation of vegetables consumed raw in areas where soil and water contamination by feces occurs may represent a way to human infection by intestinal parasites or commensals.(4)
In Brazil, traditional communities composed of people descending from Afro-Brazilian former slaves sharing a territory and cultural traits, known as 'Quilombola' communities,(5) represent people that live in vulnerable conditions, with difficult access to health, education, treated water or garbage collection services.(6,7,8,9,10) This situation contributes to the occurrence of several parasitic diseases, including the intestinal ones.(6)
Cirqueira-Júnior et al.(8) studied the domiciliary structure and the occurrence of intestinal parasites reported by health professionals, in the 'Quilombola' community of Quartel do Indaiá, located in the Minas Gerais State. These authors stated that houses have good living conditions; however, sanitation structures are precarious or even absent. Additionally, the same study reports the continuous occurrence of ascariasis among children and adults, with frequent findings of worms in feces, and oral and nasal cavities, suggesting high environmental contamination.
Considering this situation, the present study aimed to verify the occurrence of intestinal parasites among people, the environmental contamination by intestinal parasites in soil and vegetables, and fecal contamination of water in the 'Quilombola' community of Quartel do Indaiá, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.
METHODS
Study area
This study was carried out at the community of Quartel do Indaiá (Latitude: -18.02; Longitude: -43.735; Elevation: 970 m.a.s.l.), located in the municipality of Diamantina, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil. This community is recognized as reminiscent of a Quilombola-community.(11) In 2011, 126 people, of 25 families, were living there. Most of the houses did not have bathrooms, and the wastewater was released directly in the soil or the rivers that surround the community.8 Economics is based on agriculture and cattle rearing, and the cultivation of kitchen garden is a common activity among the inhabitants.
There is a primary school in the community, and the nearest health facility is located in the São João da Chapada village, nine kilometers afar.
Parasitological analysis of feces, soil and vegetables
Occurrence of intestinal parasites and commensals was evaluated by means of coprological analysis. Fecal samples were collected in vials containing formaldehyde solution (10 %) and processed by spontaneous sedimentation, according to Hoffman et al.(12) Briefly, feces (~5 g) were homogenized with water and filtered in gauze to a 250 mL sedimentation glass. The volume of the glass was filled with water and the solution remained in sedimentation for at least 6 h. A drop of final sediment was analyzed in triplicate under light microscope at 400x magnification (Olympus CX41, Tokyo, Japan). An iodine solution was used for better visualization of cysts.
Soil samples were collected from the ground's surface (maximum 5cm depth) and stored in plastic bags. Three samples were collected in the surroundings of the houses (~2 m), three samples were collected in the surroundings the sewer (latrines or the places that the habitants used to defecate directly on soil), and three samples were collected in the kitchen garden, wherever there was presence of it. The samples comprised approximately 50 g of soil, and 20 g were processed by spontaneous sedimentation.(13) The procedure was similar to the described for fecal samples. Sediment was analyzed in triplicate under light microscope at 400x magnification (Olympus CX41, Tokyo, Japan).
Vegetables were collected according to availability from the kitchen gardens of the community. They were donated by the owners and stored in plastic bags at 6°C until analysis, which occurred at a maximum 48 h interval after collection. Analyses were carried out according to Luz et al.(14)
The vegetables leaves were separated and those damaged were discarded. Remaining leaves were individually washed with a detergent solution (0.5 % v/v) of Tween 80 in 0.85 % NaCl saline solution. Washing liquid was filtered through gauze in a sedimentation glass. After 24 h sediment was centrifuged (855 x g; 2 min). The final sediment was analyzed in triplicate under light microscope at 400x magnification (Olympus CX41, Tokyo, Japan). Vegetables were collected throughout a year, depending on availability and culture season.
Fecal samples were collected between April 2013 and June 2013, soil samples were collected between April 2013 and May 2013, and vegetable samples were collected between April 2013 and July 2014. For all sampled materials, the intestinal coccidian occurrence was not evaluated.
Microbiological analysis of water
Because water used by people of Quartel do Indaiá for consumption and irrigation is not treated, a microbiological analysis was proposed, to verify fecal contamination. Five water samples were collected in the community. Four 100 mL samples were obtained at the two main watercourses (the Caeté-Mirim and Luiz Carlos rivers) surrounding the community (one sample before the river enters the community and another one immediately after the river leaves the community), and one sample was collected from the water tank that supplies most of the houses in the community. Samples were collected in sterile culture bottles and added with ColiTag® chromogenic substrate. They were incubated at 35 °C (± 0.5 °C) for 24 h and, afterwards, analyzed according to the manufacturer instructions. This method presents good performance in the evaluation of water collected from rivers and from public supply.(15) A sample with sterile water was used as negative control. Positivity for total coliforms was confirmed by yellow coloration, and positivity for Escherichia coli was confirmed when samples became fluorescent at UV light (365 nm) exposition. Negative control remained colorless. The water samples were collected in August 2014.
Ethical statements
This study followed the Brazilian ethics statements, and was approved by the Ethics Committee of Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, under the protocol number 078/2012. Informed consent was obtained from the participants or from parents or legal guardians, in the case of participants under legal age. All people with positive diagnosis for intestinal parasites received free medical consultation and treatment.
RESULTS
During the collection of feces, 78 people able to participate were present in the community, and 66 agreed and provided samples. The participants included 32 males and 34 females, with ages ranging from less than one year to 86 years old. Occurrence of intestinal parasites and/or commensals was observed in 30 (45.5 %) samples, affecting people of all age groups. Main parasites and commensals were A. lumbricoides, Entamoeba coli , and Endolimax nana, which appeared in 12 (18.2 %) samples each. In 13 (19.7 %) samples, more than one parasite or commensal were observed (table 1).
Among the 25 houses existing in the community, soil samples were collected in 19. The remaining houses were uninhabited, or the residents did not provide feces samples, so they were excluded of soil and vegetables collection in this study. The soil analysis revealed contamination in 26 samples (20.6 %), from a total of 126 (13 positives/57 analyzed around the houses, 8/45 in the waste, 5/24 in kitchen gardens) from 39 sites. The positive sites and the contaminants are shown in table 2, which presents the contamination by cysts of E. coli, E. nana andI. butschlii, and eggs of A. lumbricoides and Enterobius vermicularis.
Vegetables were obtained from seven kitchen gardens. Contamination was observed in 75 out of 135 samples among seven of eight analyzed vegetables (table 3). The contaminants were eggs of A. lumbricoides and hookworm, and cists of E. coli.
The distribution of the occurrence of intestinal parasites or commensals among people, in soil and vegetables in the community of Quartel do Indaiá was spread over the community, as shown in the figure.
The microbiological assessment of water revealed that all samples were contaminated by total and fecal coliforms.
DISCUSSION
The Brazilian rural communities face difficulties to access treated water and sanitary structures, a fact that may favor the contamination and infection by intestinal pathogens and commensals. The traditional communities, such as the 'Quilombola' and indigenous communities, have been historically marginalized, and present high occurrence of diseases related to lack of sanitation.(6)
In the 'Quilombola' community of Quartel do Indaiá, the positivity for intestinal parasites or commensals reached almost half of all examined people. These results are in accordance with previous observations among other 'Quilombola' communities in the States of Minas Gerais,(16) Bahia,(6) and Espírito Santo,(17) where positivity was observed among 63.8 %, 35.4 % and 42.7 % of all examined people, respectively.
The positivity for intestinal parasites/commensals was detected in all age groups, corroborating the observations of Cirqueira-Júnior et al.(8) for analysis of medical records from the same community. Intestinal parasitism tends to decrease with age,(18) but in places that maintain high environmental contamination, this situation may not occur.(19) It is also remarkable that 43 % of positive people presented more than one intestinal parasite/commensal, including a person aging more than 60 years old who presented four different species.
A. lumbricoides was the most frequently detected intestinal parasite, occurring in all age groups. It represents the main intestinal helminth infecting people around the world,(2) and its presence is closely related to inadequate sanitary conditions.(20) Among protozoa, the commensals, E. coli and E. nana, were the most frequently detected. Although they do not represent immediate risk to human health, the detection of intestinal commensals indicates the intake of cysts, as they share the same route of the parasitic species.(21)
Analyses of vegetables, soil and water confirmed the high environmental contamination by fecal material in the community of Quartel do Indaiá. This situation probably results from the lack of sanitation observed in this community, in which all households release sewerage directly at the soil or the rivers,(8) as also observed among indigenous communities of the Paraná State, Brazil, where peridomiciliar soil contamination was directly associated to the absence of bathrooms and the presence of feces on the soil.(22,23) The finding of contamination of soil only in the surroundings of houses with infected people in Quartel do Indaiá reinforces this idea.
The contamination of food and water associated to poor hygiene habits may favor reinfection by intestinal parasites. Many studies have demonstrated that vegetables may carry protozoan cysts or helminth eggs.(24,25,26) Since the investigated vegetables are often for used for raw consumption, if their sanitization is precarious, they may possibly serve as infection sources for intestinal parasites.(27)
The results presented high environmental contamination in Quartel do Indaiá. However, it is probable that the contamination is even higher, as the collection of soil and water, for example, was done only once for each site. The human infections may as well be underestimated, as the diagnosis was based on only one method and using a single sample.(28) Nevertheless, these findings may contribute to better understanding of the health and sanitary conditions among traditional communities in Brazil, supporting health policies to solve those issues.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCES
1. Hotez PJ, Brindley PJ, Bethony JM, King CH, Pearce EJ, Jacobson J. Helminth infections: the great neglected tropical diseases. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(4):1311-21. DOI: 10.1172/JCI34261
2. Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521-32. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68653-4
3. Turkeltaub JA, McCarty TR, Hotez PJ. The intestinal protozoa: emerging impact on global health and development. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2015;31(1):38-44. DOI: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000135
4. Gomes-Neto NJ, Pessoa RML, Queiroga IMBN, Magnani M, Freitas FIS, Souza EL, et al. Bacterial counts and the occurrence of parasites in lettuce (Lactuca sativa) from different cropping systems in Brazil. Food Control. 2012;28(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.04.033
5. Schmitt A, Turatti MCM, Carvalho MCP. A atualização do conceito de quilombo: identidade e território nas definições teóricas. Ambiente Soc. 2002;5(10):129-36. DOI: 10.1590/S1414-753X2002000100008
6. Amorim MM, Tomazi L, Silva RAA, Gestinari RS, Figueiredo TB. Avaliação das condições habitacionais e de saúde da comunidade 'quilombola' Boqueirão, Bahia, Brasil. Biosci J. 2013;29(4):1049-57. Available from: http://www.seer.ufu.br/index.php/biosciencejournal/article/view/17308/12929
7. Bezerra VM, Medeiros DS, Gomes KO, Souzas R, Giatti L, Steffens AP, et al. Inquérito de Saúde em Comunidades quilombolas de Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brasil (Projeto COMQUISTA): aspectos metodológicos e análise descritiva. Cien Saude Colet. 2014;19(6):1835-47. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232014196.01992013
8. Cirqueira-Júnior H, Grossmann SMC, Murta NMG, Dias JVL, Pires HHR. Saúde em comunidade quilombola: caracterização ambiental e ocorrência de enteroparasitoses. Rev Univ Vale Rio Verde. 2015;13(2):603-12. DOI: 10.5892/ruvrd.v13i1.2509
9. Marques AS, Freitas DA, Leão CDA, Oliveira SKM, Pereira MM, Caldeira AP. Atenção Primária e saúde materno-infantil: a percepção de cuidadores em uma comunidade rural quilombola. Cien Saude Colet. 2014;19(2):365-71. DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232014192.02992013
10. Santos RC, Silva MS. Condições de vida e itinerários terapêuticos de quilombolas de Goiás. Saude Soc. 2014;23(3):1049-63. DOI: 10.1590/S0104-12902014000300025
11. CEDEFES - Centro de Documentação Eloy Ferreira Silva. Comunidades quilombolas de Minas Gerais no séc. XXI - História e resistência. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica; 2008.
12. Hoffmann WA, Pons JA, Janer JL. The sedimentation concentration method in schistosomiasis mansoni. P R J Public Health Trop Med. 1934;9:283-91. Available from: http://libraria.rcm.upr.edu:8080/jspui/bitstream/2010/809/1/The%20Sedimentation%20Concentration.pdf
13. Neves RLS, Massara CL. Contaminação do solo de áreas comunitárias do município de Caratinga, MG, Brasil, por ovos de Toxocara sp. e cistos de Entamoeba sp. Rev Patol Trop. 2009;38(2):126-30. DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v38i2.6626
14. Luz JGG, Barbosa MV, de Carvalho AG, Resende SD, Dias JVL, Martins HR. Contamination by intestinal parasites in vegetables marketed in an area of Jequitinhonha Valley, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Nutr. 2009;30(1):99-108. DOI: 10.1590/1678-98652017000100012
15. Marquezi MC, Gallo CR, Dias CTS. Comparação entre métodos para a análise de coliformes totais e E. coli em amostras de água. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz. 2010;69(3):291-6. Available from: http://revistas.bvs-vet.org.br/rialutz/article/view/6329/6023
16. Andrade EC, Leite ICG, Vieira MT, Abramo C, Tibiriçá SHC, Silva PL. Prevalência de parasitoses intestinais em comunidade 'quilombola' no Município de Bias Fortes, Estado de Minas Gerais, Brasil, 2008. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2011;20(3):337-44. DOI: 10.5123/S1679-49742011000300008
17. Damazio SM, Lima MS, Soares AR, Souza MAA. Intestinal parasites in a 'quilombola' community of the Northern State of Espírito Santo, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2013;55(3):179-83. DOI: 10.1590/S0036-46652013000300007
18. Ludwig KM, Frei F, Alvares-Filho F, Ribeiro-Paes JT. Correlação entre condições de saneamento básico e enteroparasitoses na população de Assis, Estado de São Paulo. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999;32(5):547-55. DOI: 10.1590/S0037-86821999000500013
19. Ferreira CS, Ferreira MU, Nogueira MR. Prevalência e intensidade de infecção por Ascaris lumbricoides em amostra populacional urbana (São Paulo, SP). Cad Saude Publica. 1991;7(1):82-9. DOI: 10.1590/S0102-311X1991000100007
20. Strunz EC, Addiss DG, Stocks ME, Ogden S, Utzinger J, Freeman MC. Water, sanitation, hygiene, and soil-transmitted helminth infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2014;11(3):e1001620. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001620
21. Branco N, Leal DAG, Franco RMB. A parasitological survey of natural water springs and inhabitants of a tourist city in Southeastern Brazil. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12(5):410-17. DOI: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0679
22. Moura FT, Falavigna DLM, Mota LT, Toledo MJO. Enteroparasite contamination in peridomiciliar soils of two indigenous territories, State of Paraná, southern Brazil. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2010;27(6):414-22. Available from: https://scielosp.org/article/rpsp/2010.v27n6/414-422/en/
23. Silva JB, Piva C, Falavigna-Guilherme AL, Rossoni DF, Toledo MJO. Spatial distribution and enteroparasite contamination in peridomiciliar soil and water in the Apucaraninha Indigenous Land, southern Brazil. Environ Monit Assess. 2016;188(4):e217. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-016-5216-4
24. Falavigna-Guilherme AL, Araújo SM, Falavigna DLM, Pupulim ART, Dias MLGG, Oliveira HS, et al. Prevalência de enteroparasitas em horticultores e hortaliças da Feira do Produtor de Maringá, Paraná. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 1999;32(4):405-11. DOI: 10.1590/S0037-86821999000400012
25. Maikai BV, Elisha IA, Baba-Onoja EBT. Contamination of vegetables sold in markets with helminth eggs in Zaria metropolis, Kaduna State, Nigeria. Food Control. 2012;28(2):345-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.05.035
26. Silva MRP, Pinheiro FC, Paula MT, Prigol M. Avaliação parasitológica de alfaces (Lactuca sativa) comercializadas em um município da Fronteira Oeste, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Rev Patol Trop. 2015;44(2):163-9. DOI: 10.5216/rpt.v44i2.36646
27. Fallah AA, Pirali-Kheirabadi K, Shirvani F, Saei-Dehkordi SS. Prevalence of parasitic contamination in vegetables used for raw consumption in Shahrekord, Iran: Influence of season and washing procedure. Food Control. 2012;25(2):617-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.12.004
28. Carvalho GLX, Moreira LE, Pena JL, Marinho CC, Bahia MT, Machado-Coelho GLL. A comparative study of the TF-Test®, Kato-Katz, Hoffman-Pons-Janer, Willis and Baermann-Moraes coprologic methods for the detection of human parasitosis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2012;107(1):80-4. DOI: 10.1590/S0074-02762012000100011
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Financial support
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG-APQ-03148-12); Programa Institucional de Bolsas de Extensão (PIBEx).
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2019 Priscila Ferreira Pires Eustachio, LetÃcia Andrade Avelar, João Victor Leite Dias, Dimas Ramon Mota Queiroz, Nadja Maria Gomes Murta, Gustavo Henrique Bahia de Oliveira, Rosana Passos Cambraia, Herton Helder Rocha Pires, Helen Rodrigues Martins
Esta obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.